Marijuana’s medical attributes vastly overstated

Pot’s benefits have been overstated by political advocates and scientists, whose bias may have tainted research results

Lee HardingMarijuana users want society to believe the very thing they’ve told themselves for years – that the highs of marijuana far outweigh its lows when it comes to health and the effect on the masses.

Informed minds that remain sober and less tainted by personal bias realize that’s probably not the case.

Cannabis is demonstrably helpful for a limited number of conditions and even then may not be the best clinical first choice.

Meanwhile, those damned downsides remain.

In Canada, medical marijuana use has grown dramatically from just 7,914 registered users in 2014 to 201,398 in 2017. This prevalence varies widely, from just 0.07 per cent of the population in Quebec to 1.7 per cent in Alberta. But as popularity has grown, many doctors have wanted more guidance as to when cannabis is an appropriate option.

From a public relations perspective, medicinal marijuana was a no-brainer for pot enthusiasts. Once society conceded an upside to marijuana, it became difficult to argue for its prohibition to prevent harm. It should surprise no one if marijuana’s benefits have been overhyped or overstated, not only by political advocates but also by researchers whose bias may have helped them find what they wanted to see. Perhaps some were blinded by the haze of their own consumption.

Researchers at the University of Alberta found the positive case for pot was weaker than many have been led to believe. G. Michael Allan and 18 colleagues looked at 31 systematic reviews of the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids, which altogether encompassed 1,085 studies. Allan’s team found that while studies were plentiful, quality was rare. Randomized clinical trials were limited or absent. Small sample sizes and short durations were common, making false positives more likely. Important quality markers were often absent, undermining the reliability of the results, if not creating outright bias.

Earlier this year, the Canadian Family Physician published Allan’s “Simplified guideline for prescribing medical cannabinoids in primary care.” Copies were sent to 30,000 doctors, recommending that cannabinoids be prescribed solely for “neuropathic pain, palliative and end-of-life pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and spasticity due to multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury.” Only the synthetic cannabinoid of nabilone or nabiximols is recommended, and even then only after two other options have been tried.

These options exclude actual pot-smoking, partly because the chemical composition of an individual plant always varies – sometimes substantially. Cannabis has more than 500 compounds and over 100 cannabinoids have been identified. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the primary psychoactive component. Cannabidiol (CBD) is also significant and seems to prevent some of the adverse effects of THC.

Marijuana has grown in potency in both America and Europe. One study of American pot showed that in the 20 years following 1995, THC content had tripled while CBD dropped. Whereas THC content had been 14 times that of CBD, by the end of 2014, that number was 80.

Allan prefers that doctors prescribe cannabis as a third option at best, due to such potential harms as brain damage.

Endocannabinoids help synapses (which connect neurons) form properly as brains develop, a process often incomplete until age 25. Regular marijuana use in adolescence alters brain connectivity and reduces volume, inhibiting memory, learning and impulse control.

One 25-year study of 4,000 young adults found that marijuana lowered verbal memory. A study in New Zealand found that frequent marijuana use in adolescence led to a loss of six IQ points in mid-adulthood, even if consumption stopped in adulthood.

High cannabis use also correlates with mental health problems. Use in adolescence increases the risk of schizophrenia-like psychoses and can actually trigger them. Cannabis users develop psychosis two or three years earlier than others – an effect not seen from alcohol or other substance use.

Amotivational syndrome is a chronic disorder first recognized in the 1960s by patients with longtime cannabis use. This involves changes in personality, emotions and brain function characterized by inward-turning, apathy and blunted affect.

The potential for lung damage and cancer due to marijuana smoking is greater than that for tobacco. One study even suggested that smoking one joint a day caused the same lung damage and cancer risk as 20 cigarettes. Higher carcinogenic content is part of the reason but a greater degree of inhaled smoke is the other. THC also suppresses the immune system.

Cannabis can also cause acute pancreatitis, though the exact mechanism is unclear.

In addition, marijuana’s cure for budget deficits has been overstated. The federal government has already spent $800 million to prepare for legalization, gobbling more than the first year’s tax revenues.

Now youth can carry five grams (seven joints) without criminal prosecution and return to homes with four plants producing 300 grams each.

The majority of health and social costs won’t be borne for decades. By then, history books will show how marijuana legalization was the successful prescription to mobilize the millennial vote.

Lee Harding is research fellow for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.


medical marijuana

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

2 Responses to "Marijuana’s medical attributes vastly overstated"

  1. Jayden   Nov 5, 2018 at 5:56 pm

    This is the utmost bias piece of trash I have read in a long while. This is fear mongering at its finest. To say these studies do not have merit is a fallacy in the sense that because of their limits and restrictions we deem them out of scope. However, the contrary is true. These studies give us more insight on how to control and manipulate other studies to show the true effects of cannabis. Also, calling the plant by its racially destructive name is something that needs to be given thought. I find the media loves to use the demonized derogatory term “marijuana ” when they want to leave a scathing impression. The plant is called cannabis… get it right.

  2. phytocannabinoidscience   Nov 5, 2018 at 6:41 pm

    PERVASIVE INSTITUTIONALIZED NEGATIVE BIAS AGAINST ALL FORMS OF CANNABIS USE

    The acceptance of the false information that cannabis is detrimental to human health was institutionalized into society many decades ago and unfortunately it takes even longer to unlearn bad information than it does too learn valid information.

    Cannabinoids have been ignored as potent medicines due to the pharmaceutical industry’s failure to successfully isolate and synthesize any beneficial individual cannabinoid compounds; They have ignored the synergy and entourage effects of the complex of over 100 Cannabinoids and 100s of terpenes in the Cannabis plant due to the industry wide fixation on the current ‘Isolate, target, Patent for Profit’, system of pharmaceutical research.

    There is a Pervasive, Institutionalized, Negative Bias against all forms of Cannabis Use that has existed for almost a century and is still rampant in virtually all institutions that form the structure of our society and those who populate those agencies are institutionalized to think ideologically and only in terms of addiction and harm reduction, crime and punishment, Patent and Profit…; In the case of Cannabis they are completely ignoring the abundance of positive heath benefits that the various forms of Whole Plant Cannabinoid Therapy could provide a multitude of individuals, all because it conflicts with established ideological mentality, and/or, it does not fit the current ‘patent and profit’ mandate of pharmaceutical research and production, and marketing.

    Our Medical Institutions, and the professionals within them that make up part of our society, have been either complicit, or at the very least, had blind faith in the claims of the Pharmaceutical industry while simultaneously ignoring the abundance of scientific studies, and evidence, indicating Cannabinoids have multiple health care applications from treating depression, to curing Cancer (Cannabinoids kill cancer cells via apoptosis and anti-angiogenesis. Know since 1974), to preventing and treating Alzheimer’s.

    Our institutions ignore the positives of medicinal cannabis and continue to perpetuate the same false narrative that ‘Cannabis is inherently dangerous’ with essentially no valid foundation in scientific reality; I believe this occurs due to ‘Institutionalized bias’ and for our national institutions to acknowledge the factual reality of the benefits of Cannabinoid Therapy would require all of our medical professions to admit that Cannabis works as a treatment for many Human Ailments; They would also have to admit they do not know how it works AND that, as a civilized developed society, we should have been studying Cannabinoids for at least 5 decades, if not more, and that not only our medical profession, but society as a whole, has completely failed on the issue of cannabis and Public Health.

    Until our Governments, Our Public Institutions, Our Medical professionals and the institutions they represent, Our Law Enforcement Agencies, and society in general, abandon the decades of misinformation and misunderstanding on how the phytocannabinoids in the cannabis plant interact with the Human Endocannabinoid System, we will continue to spend more resources on unnecessary legislation and continued delays instead of implementing proper legislation providing access to the vast medicinal potential of this very safe and effective medicinal plant and health supplement.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login