Major financial institutions are revisiting their commitment to curbing oil and gas investment
In the past few months there have been some noteworthy developments for the global alliance known as GFANZ (Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero).
GFANZ, founded by Mark Carney and Michael Bloomberg in the spring of last year and promoted at COP26, is the world’s largest (US$150 trillion) coalition of 500 financial institutions committed to transitioning the global economy to net zero greenhouse gas emissions.
But already, some of the organizations have been questioning their membership in the Alliance.
In October, GFANZ lost two pension funds and a consulting company. Major U.S. banks, including JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, have also been considering exiting. Even some Canadian banks are having second thoughts about their membership in the alliance.
 |
| Related Stories |
| Net zero has been a boon to dictators
|
| Canada must capitalize on the coming CCS boom
|
| After 50 years, UN-led environmental central planning is failing |
So why have these big players been considering leaving? Because of stringent Race to Zero policies that have a specific requirement to withdraw funding from fossil fuel companies.
These banks know that this will come with potential legal, reputational and governance risks. It also makes no financial sense when the demand for oil and gas around the world is only increasing.
Now is not the time to sign on to a pledge of divestment, when issues of energy security and energy poverty can be helped by investment in the oil and gas sector.
As a result of the threatened departure of some members, GFANZ now says that, going forward, members will be “encouraged, but not required, to partner with the Race to Zero.”
As JP Morgan Chase Bank CEO Jamie Dimon told congressional hearings on Capitol Hill in September, “we will not refrain from making new investments in major oil and gas development projects.”
He went on to tell the members that JP Morgan Chase would “absolutely not stop investing in oil and gas because that would be the road to hell for America.” Instead, he said, “the world needs proper investing in the oil and gas complex.”
Dimon’s words apply equally to Canada, where divestment in the oil and gas sector would also be the road to hell. Investment and support for the sector should be top of mind for Canadian bank CEOs right now for four important reasons:
- The oil and gas industry’s well-being is essential to the well-being of Canadians, ensuring energy affordability and, with it, the affordability of everything else necessary to a reasonable standard of living for all in Canada;
- The sector’s environmental performance is world-leading and steadily improving;
- Its expansion is increasingly vital to addressing global concerns such as energy security and energy poverty; and
- A lack of investment in Canada means more investment in oil and gas sector development in other parts of the world with poorer environmental performance, poorer corporate governance, and serious human rights infringements.
The divestment agenda and pledges to divest from the oil and gas sector, like the Race to Zero, must be rejected, especially in Canada, where the industry is the backbone of the Canadian economy.
Adopting a pro-investment stance in Canadian oil and gas is good for the economy, the environment, innovation, financial institutions, shareholders, and everyday Canadians.
Gina Pappano is the former head of market intelligence at the Toronto Stock Exchange. She is executive director of InvestNow Inc., a non-profit dedicated to demonstrating that investing in Canada’s resource sectors helps Canada and the world.
For interview requests, click here.
The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.
© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.
