Donald Trump did not break democratic institutions

He simply revealed how much their ability to restrain political power has eroded

Interview requests

Donald Trump’s disregard for international law and the U.S. Constitution has become increasingly blatant—and the institutions meant to restrain him are no longer responding with the force they once did.

The framers of the American government understood that democracy depends on friction. Checks and balances exist to slow power, compel justification and require agreement among competing institutions, so that no single branch can dominate the system. For most of its 250-year history, that design worked. It carried the United States through wars, scandals and political upheaval. The federal government was deliberately divided into legislative, judicial and executive branches so that no one could rule unchecked. During Donald Trump’s first term, those mechanisms still held often enough to limit his most extreme impulses.

What has changed is not the architecture of democracy, but its resilience—and that loss of resilience is neither accidental nor acceptable. For decades, the institutions meant to enforce accountability have been weakened or sidelined.

This erosion rarely happens through dramatic acts. It occurs quietly, through funding pressures, political appointments, procedural delays and the steady normalization of behaviour that once triggered resistance. Over time, institutions remain standing, but their capacity to act decisively erodes.

After consumer and environmental advocacy in the 1960s delivered real gains for ordinary people, corporate interests pushed back aggressively. The Powell Memo, written in 1971 by corporate lawyer Lewis Powell for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, urged businesses to use courts, politics, academia and the media more forcefully to counter consumer and regulatory pressure. It was not a call for secrecy, but for systematic, long-term pressure to reshape institutions, norms and public understanding in favour of corporate interests. Powell’s later appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States showed how firmly that strategy took hold. In time, those ideas reshaped how power was exercised—and how resistance to it was constrained.

The consequences are no longer subtle. Corporate influence expanded while regulatory agencies weakened. In the United States, corporate financing of elections and relentless lobbying have distorted policy-making and undermined democratic accountability. These developments represent a failure of political courage and institutional resolve, not an unavoidable byproduct of modern capitalism.

Their effects have also shaped democratic systems elsewhere, including Canada, where lobbying practices, regulatory frameworks and political norms are closely influenced by U.S. models.

The danger is that this kind of institutional weakening rarely looks like a crisis at first. Laws still exist. Courts still sit. Elections still occur. But when institutions lose confidence, independence and credibility, leaders test limits. Norms erode. Extraordinary measures become easier to justify and harder to reverse. Democratic decline rarely announces itself. It advances while citizens are told nothing fundamental has changed.

It must be stated plainly that this trajectory is unacceptable. Corporations play a legitimate role in a capitalist economy, but they must never be allowed to overpower the institutions responsible for oversight and restraint. When economic power overwhelms democratic accountability, the result is not efficiency or growth, but political distortion and public distrust.

The lesson is urgency. Democracies rarely fall in a single blow. They become brittle when checks and balances wear down, when dissent is treated as a nuisance rather than a safeguard, and when citizens are conditioned to accept shrinking accountability as normal. If this erosion continues, the damage will not arrive as a dramatic rupture. It will come as the quiet hollowing out of the institutions meant to protect democratic life itself—and that outcome should alarm anyone who still believes democracy is worth defending.

Gerry Chidiac specializes in languages and genocide studies and works with at-risk students. He received an award from the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre for excellence in teaching about the Holocaust.